Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traub, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jefferys, J. G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Traub, R. D.
Right arrow Articles by Jefferys, J. G. R.

Neural Computation, Vol 9, 1251-1264, Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press


LETTERS

Gamma Oscillation Model Predicts Intensity Coding by Phase Rather Than Frequency

Roger D. Traub, Miles A. Whittington and John G. R. Jefferys

Gamma-frequency electroencephalogram oscillations may be important for cognitive processes such as feature binding. Gammaoscillations occur in hippocampus in vivo during the theta state, following physiological sharp waves, and after seizures, and they can be evoked in vitro by tetanic stimulation. In neocortex, gamma oscillations occur under conditions of sensory stimulation as well as during sleep. After tetanic or sensory stimulation, oscillations in regions separated by several millimeters or more occur at the same frequency, but with phase lags ranging from less than 1 ms to 10 ms, depending on the conditions of stimulation. We have constructed a distributed network model of pyramidal cells and interneurons, based on a variety of experiments, that accounts for near-zero phase lag synchrony of oscillations over long distances (with axon conduction delays totaling 16 ms or more). Here we show that this same model can also account for fixed positive phase lags between nearby cell groups coexisting with near-zero phase lags between separated cell groups, a phenomenon known to occur in visual cortex. The model achieves this because interneurons fire spike doublets and triplets that have average zero phase difference throughout the network; this provides a temporal framework on which pyramidal cell phase lags can be superimposed, the lag depending on how strongly the pyramidal cells are excited.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
G. Schneider, M. N. Havenith, and D. Nikolic
Spatiotemporal Structure in Large Neuronal Networks Detected from Cross-Correlation.
Neural Comput., October 1, 2006; 18(10): 2387 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press.