Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strangman, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strangman, G.

Neural Computation, Vol 9, 51-76, Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press


LETTERS

Detecting Synchronous Cell Assemblies with Limited Data and Overlapping Assemblies

Gary Strangman

Two statistical methods--cross-correlation (Moore et al. 1966) and gravity clustering (Gerstein et al. 1985)--were evaluated for their ability to detect synchronous cell assemblies from simulated spike train data. The two methods were first analyzed for their temporal sensitivity to synchronous cell assemblies. The presented approach places a lower bound on the amount of data required to detect a synchronous assembly. On average, both methods required the same minimum amount of recording time to detect significant pairwise correlations, but the gravity method exhibited less variance in the recording time. The precise length of recording depends on the consistency with which a neuron fires synchronously with the assembly but was independent of the assembly firing rate. Next, the statistical methods were tested with respect to their ability to differentiate two distinct assemblies that overlapped in time and space. Both statistics could adequately differentiate two overlapping synchronous assemblies. For cross-correlation, this ability deteriorates quickly when considering three or more simultaneously active, overlapping assemblies, whereas the gravity method should be more flexible in this regard. The work demonstrates the difficulty of detecting assembly phenomena from simultaneous neuronal recordings. Other statistical methods and the detection of other types of assemblies are also discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. N. Baker and G. L. Gerstein
Improvements to the Sensitivity of Gravitational Clustering for Multiple Neuron Recordings
Neural Comput., November 1, 2000; 12(11): 2597 - 2620.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. G. Lindsey, K. F. Morris, R. Shannon, and G. L. Gerstein
Repeated Patterns of Distributed Synchrony in Neuronal Assemblies
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1997; 78(3): 1714 - 1719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1997 by The MIT Press.