Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Glasmachers, T.
Right arrow Articles by Igel, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Glasmachers, T.
Right arrow Articles by Igel, C.
(Neural Computation. 2008;20:374-382.)
© 2008 The MIT Press


Note

Second-Order SMO Improves SVM Online and Active Learning

Tobias Glasmachers

Tobias.Glasmachers{at}neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany

Christian Igel

c.igel{at}ieee.org Institut für Neuroinformatik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany

Iterative learning algorithms that approximate the solution of support vector machines (SVMs) have two potential advantages. First, they allow online and active learning. Second, for large data sets, computing the exact SVM solution may be too time-consuming, and an efficient approximation can be preferable. The powerful LASVM iteratively approaches the exact SVM solution using sequential minimal optimization (SMO). It allows efficient online and active learning. Here, this algorithm is considerably improved in speed and accuracy by replacing the working setselection in the SMO steps. A second-order working set selection strategy, which greedily aims at maximizing the progress in each single step, is incorporated.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2008 by The MIT Press.