Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lansner, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Johansson, C.
Right arrow Articles by Lansner, A.
(Neural Computation. 2007;19:1871-1896.)
© 2007 The MIT Press


Letter

Imposing Biological Constraints onto an Abstract Neocortical Attractor Network Model

Christopher Johansson

cjo{at}nada.kth.se School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

Anders Lansner

ala{at}nada.kth.se School of Computer Science and Communication, Royal Institute of Technology, and Stockholm University, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden

In this letter, we study an abstract model of neocortex based on its modularization into mini- and hypercolumns. We discuss a full-scale instance of this model and connect its network properties to the underlying biological properties of neurons in cortex. In particular, we discuss how the biological constraints put on the network determine the network's performance in terms of storage capacity. We show that a network instantiating the model scales well given the biologically constrained parameters on activity and connectivity, which makes this network interesting also as an engineered system. In this model, the minicolumns are grouped into hypercolumns that can be active or quiescent, and the model predicts that only a few percent of the hypercolumns should be active at any one time. With this model, we show that at least 20 to 30 pyramidal neurons should be aggregated into a minicolumn and at least 50 to 60 minicolumns should be grouped into a hypercolumn in order to achieve high storage capacity.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2007 by The MIT Press.