|
|
||||||||
Note |
amari{at}brain.riken.jp
hiro{at}brain.riken.jp RIKEN Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan
The decoding scheme of a stimulus can be different from the stochastic encoding scheme in the neural population coding. The stochastic fluctuations are not independent in general, but an independent version could be used for the ease of decoding. How much information is lost by using this unfaithful model for decoding? There are discussions concerning loss of information (Nirenberg & Latham, 2003; Schneidman, Bialek, & Berry, 2003). We elucidate the Nirenberg-Latham loss from the point of view of information geometry.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Scaglione, G. Foffani, G. Scannella, S. Cerutti, and K. A. Moxon Mutual Information Expansion for Studying the Role of Correlations in Population Codes: How Important Are Autocorrelations? Neural Comput., November 1, 2008; 20(11): 2662 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Foffani, J. K. Chapin, and K. A. Moxon Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 268 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wu, K. Hamaguchi, and S.-i. Amari Dynamics and Computation of Continuous Attractors Neural Comput., April 1, 2007; 20(4): 994 - 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |