|
|
||||||||
Letter |
ilya.nemenman{at}columbia.edu, Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, and Joint Centers for Systems Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, U.S.A.
Advances in statistical learning theory have resulted in a multitude of different designs of learning machines. But which ones are implemented by brains and other biological information processors? We analyze how various abstract Bayesian learners perform on different data and argue that it is difficult to determine which learningtheoretic computation is performed by a particular organism using just its performance in learning a stationary target (learning curve). Based on the fluctuationdissipation relation in statistical physics, we then discuss a different experimental setup that might be able to solve the problem.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Cheng and P. N. Sabes Calibration of Visually Guided Reaching Is Driven by Error-Corrective Learning and Internal Dynamics J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 3057 - 3069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |