|
|
||||||||
Letter |
murat{at}neurostat.mgh.harvard.edu, Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114-2698, U.S.A.
wilson{at}ai.mit.edu, Picower Center for Learning and Memory, Riken-MIT Neuroscience Research Center, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
brown{at}neurostat.mgh.harvard.edu, Neuroscience Statistics Research Laboratory, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA 02114-2698, U.S.A.
Analyzing the dependencies between spike trains is an important step in understanding how neurons work in concert to represent biological signals. Usually this is done for pairs of neurons at a time using correlation-based techniques. Chornoboy, Schramm, and Karr (1988) proposed maximum likelihood methods for the simultaneous analysis of multiple pair-wise interactions among an ensemble of neurons. One of these methods is an iterative, continuous-time estimation algorithm for a network likelihood model formulated in terms of multiplicative conditional intensity functions. We devised a discrete-time version of this algorithm that includes a new, efficient computational strategy, a principled method to compute starting values, and a principled stopping criterion. In an analysis of simulated neural spike trains from ensembles of interacting neurons, the algorithm recovered the correct connectivity matrices and interaction parameters. In the analysis of spike trains from an ensemble of rat hippocampal place cells, the algorithm identified a connectivity matrix and interaction parameters consistent with the pattern of conjoined firing predicted by the overlap of the neurons' spatial receptive fields. These results suggest that the network likelihood model can be an efficient tool for the analysis of ensemble spiking activity.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Roxin, V. Hakim, and N. Brunel The Statistics of Repeating Patterns of Cortical Activity Can Be Reproduced by a Model Network of Stochastic Binary Neurons J. Neurosci., October 15, 2008; 28(42): 10734 - 10745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bollimunta, Y. Chen, C. E. Schroeder, and M. Ding Neuronal Mechanisms of Cortical Alpha Oscillations in Awake-Behaving Macaques J. Neurosci., October 1, 2008; 28(40): 9976 - 9988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Koyama and R. E. Kass Spike Train Probability Models for Stimulus-Driven Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons Neural Comput., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1776 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Y. Cohen, P. Pouget, G. F. Woodman, C. R. Subraveti, J. D. Schall, and A. F. Rossi Difficulty of Visual Search Modulates Neuronal Interactions and Response Variability in the Frontal Eye Field J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2580 - 2587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Seth and G. M. Edelman Distinguishing causal interactions in neural populations. Neural Comput., April 1, 2007; 19(4): 910 - 933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura Spike Train Decoding Without Spike Sorting Neural Comput., April 1, 2007; 20(4): 923 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Truccolo and J. P. Donoghue Nonparametric Modeling of Neural Point Processes via Stochastic Gradient Boosting Regression. Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 672 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |