Neural Comp. NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meunier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Borejsza, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meunier, C.
Right arrow Articles by Borejsza, K.
(Neural Computation. 2005;17:2383-2420.)
© 2005 The MIT Press


Letter

How Membrane Properties Shape the Discharge of Motoneurons: A Detailed Analytical Study

Claude Meunier

Claude.Meunier{at}univ-paris5.fr, Laboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie, UMR CNRS 8119, Université René Descartes, 75270 Paris cedex, France

Karol Borejsza

borejsza{at}lps.u-psud.fr, Laboratoire de Neurophysique et Physiologie, UMR CNRS 8119, Université René Descartes, 75270 Paris cedex, France

Electrophysiological experiments and modeling studies have shown that afterhyperpolarization regulates the discharge of lumbar motoneurons in anesthetized cats and is an important determinant of their firing properties. However, it is still unclear how firing properties depend on slow afterhyperpolarization, input conductance, and the fast currents responsible for spike generation. We study a single-compartment integrate-and-fire model with a slow potassium conductance that exponentially decays between spikes. We show that this model is analytically solvable, and we investigate how passive and active membrane properties control the discharge. We show that the model exhibits three distinct firing ranges (primary, secondary, and high frequency), and we explain the origin of these three ranges. Explicit expressions are established for the gain of the steady-state current-frequency (I–f) curve in the primary range and for the gain of the I–f curve for the first interspike interval. They show how the gain is controlled by the maximal conductance and the kinetic parameters of the afterhyperpolarization conductance. The gain also depends on the spike voltage threshold, and we compute how it is decreased by threshold accommodation (i.e., the increase of the threshold with the injected current). In contrast, the gain is not very sensitive to the input conductance. This implies that tonic synaptic activity shifts the current-frequency curve in its primary range, in agreement with experiments. Taking into account the absolute refractory period associated with spikes somewhat reduces the gain in the primary range. More importantly, it accounts for the approximately linear and steep secondary range observed in many motoneurons. In the nonphysiological high-frequency range, the behavior of the I–f curve is determined by the fast voltage-dependent currents, via the amplitude of the fast repolarization afterspike, the duration of the refractory period, and voltage threshold accommodation, if present.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
M. Manuel, C. Meunier, M. Donnet, and D. Zytnicki
The afterhyperpolarization conductance exerts the same control over the gain and variability of motoneurone firing in anaesthetized cats
J. Physiol., November 1, 2006; 576(3): 873 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Ethier, L. Brizzi, W. G. Darling, and C. Capaday
Linear Summation of Cat Motor Cortex Outputs
J. Neurosci., May 17, 2006; 26(20): 5574 - 5581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Manuel, C. Meunier, M. Donnet, and D. Zytnicki
How Much Afterhyperpolarization Conductance Is Recruited by an Action Potential? A Dynamic-Clamp Study in Cat Lumbar Motoneurons
J. Neurosci., September 28, 2005; 25(39): 8917 - 8923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2005 by The MIT Press.