HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Legenstein, R. Articles by Maass, W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Legenstein, R. Articles by Maass, W.

What Can a Neuron Learn with Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity?

legi{at}igi.tugraz.at, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Christian Naeger

naeger{at}gmx.de, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Wolfgang Maass

maass{at}igi.tugraz.at, Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, Technische Universitaet Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria

Spiking neurons are very flexible computational modules, which can implement with different values of their adjustable synaptic parameters an enormous variety of different transformations F from input spike trains to output spike trains. We examine in this letter the question to what extent a spiking neuron with biologically realistic models for dynamic synapses can be taught via spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) to implement a given transformation F. We consider a supervised learning paradigm where during training, the output of the neuron is clamped to the target signal (teacher forcing). The well-known perceptron convergence theorem asserts the convergence of a simple supervised learning algorithm for drastically simplified neuron models (McCulloch-Pitts neurons). We show that in contrast to the perceptron convergence theorem, no theoretical guarantee can be given for the convergence of STDP with teacher forcing that holds for arbitrary input spike patterns. On the other hand, we prove that average case versions of the perceptron convergence theorem hold for STDP in the case of uncorrelated and correlated Poisson input spike trains and simple models for spiking neurons. For a wide class of cross-correlation functions of the input spike trains, the resulting necessary and sufficient condition can be formulated in terms of linear separability, analogously as the well-known condition of learnability by perceptrons. However, the linear separability criterion has to be applied here to the columns of the correlation matrix of the Poisson input. We demonstrate through extensive computer simulations that the theoretically predicted convergence of STDP with teacher forcing also holds for more realistic models for neurons, dynamic synapses, and more general input distributions. In addition, we show through computer simulations that these positive learning results hold not only for the common interpretation of STDP, where STDP changes the weights of synapses, but also for a more realistic interpretation suggested by experimental data where STDP modulates the initial release probability of dynamic synapses.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Farries and A. L. Fairhall Reinforcement Learning With Modulated Spike Timing Dependent Synaptic Plasticity J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2007; 98(6): 3648 - 3665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Brader, W. Senn, and S. Fusi Learning Real-World Stimuli in a Neural Network with Spike-Driven Synaptic Dynamics Neural Comput., November 1, 2007; 19(11): 2881 - 2912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Tripp and C. Eliasmith Neural Populations Can Induce Reliable Postsynaptic Currents without Observable Spike Rate Changes or Precise Spike Timing Cereb Cortex, August 1, 2007; 17(8): 1830 - 1840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. V. Florian Reinforcement Learning Through Modulation of Spike-Timing-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity Neural Comput., June 1, 2007; 19(6): 1468 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Mossbridge, M. B. Fitzgerald, E. S. O'Connor, and B. A. Wright Perceptual-Learning Evidence for Separate Processing of Asynchrony and Order Tasks J. Neurosci., December 6, 2006; 26(49): 12708 - 12716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-P. Pfister, T. Toyoizumi, D. Barber, and W. Gerstner Optimal spike-timing-dependent plasticity for precise action potential firing in supervised learning. Neural Comput., June 1, 2006; 18(6): 1318 - 1348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]