|
|
||||||||
Note |

lansky{at}biomed.cas.cz, Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
rodrig{at}cpt.unv-mrs.fr, Centre de Physique Théorique, CNRS and Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, Université de la Méditerranée, F-13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France
sacerdote{at}dm.unito.it, Department of Mathematics, University of Torino, via Carlo Alberto 10, 10 123 Torino, Italy
Frequency coding is considered one of the most common coding strategies employed by neural systems. This fact leads, in experiments as well as in theoretical studies, to construction of so-called transfer functions, where the output firing frequency is plotted against the input intensity. The term firing frequency can be understood differently in different contexts. Basically, it means that the number of spikes over an interval of preselected length is counted and then divided by the length of the interval, but due to the obvious limitations, the length of observation cannot be arbitrarily long. Then firing frequency is defined as reciprocal to the mean interspike interval. In parallel, an instantaneous firing frequency can be defined as reciprocal to the length of current interspike interval, and by taking a mean of these, the definition can be extended to introduce the mean instantaneous firing frequency. All of these definitions of firing frequency are compared in an effort to contribute to a better understanding of the input-output properties of a neuron.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. H. Lemon and D. V. Smith Influence of response variability on the coding performance of central gustatory neurons. J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7433 - 7443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lansky and P. E. Greenwood Optimal Signal Estimation in Neuronal Models Neural Comput., October 1, 2005; 17(10): 2240 - 2257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Mottram, E. A. Christou, F. G. Meyer, and R. M. Enoka Frequency Modulation of Motor Unit Discharge Has Task-Dependent Effects on Fluctuations in Motor Output J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2878 - 2887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |