Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brette, R.
Right arrow Articles by Guigon, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brette, R.
Right arrow Articles by Guigon, E.
(Neural Computation. 2003;15:279-308.)
© 2003 The MIT Press


Letter

Reliability of Spike Timing Is a General Property of Spiking Model Neurons

Romain Brette

brette{at}ccr.jussieu.fr, Centre de Mathématiques et de Leurs Applications, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, 94230 Cachan, France, and INSERM U483, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France

Emmanuel Guigon

INSERM U483, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France

The responses of neurons to time-varying injected currents are reproducible on a trial-by-trial basis in vitro, but when a constant current is injected, small variances in interspike intervals across trials add up, eventually leading to a high variance in spike timing. It is unclear whether this difference is due to the nature of the input currents or the intrinsic properties of the neurons. Neuron responses can fail to be reproducible in two ways: dynamical noise can accumulate over time and lead to a desynchronization over trials, or several stable responses can exist, depending on the initial condition. Here we show, through simulations and theoretical considerations, that for a general class of spiking neuron models, which includes, in particular, the leaky integrate-and-fire model as well as nonlinear spiking models, aperiodic currents, contrary to periodic currents, induce reproducible responses, which are stable under noise, change in initial conditions and deterministic perturbations of the input. We provide a theoretical explanation for aperiodic currents that cross the threshold.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
P. Rowat
Interspike Interval Statistics in the Stochastic Hodgkin-Huxley Model: Coexistence of Gamma Frequency Bursts and Highly Irregular Firing
Neural Comput., May 1, 2007; 19(5): 1215 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
R. Brette
Exact Simulation of Integrate-and-Fire Models with Synaptic Conductances
Neural Comput., August 1, 2006; 18(8): 2004 - 2027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Brette and W. Gerstner
Adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire Model as an Effective Description of Neuronal Activity
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 3637 - 3642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Jolivet, T. J. Lewis, and W. Gerstner
Generalized Integrate-and-Fire Models of Neuronal Activity Approximate Spike Trains of a Detailed Model to a High Degree of Accuracy
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2004; 92(2): 959 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. Schreiber, J.-M. Fellous, P. Tiesinga, and T. J. Sejnowski
Influence of Ionic Conductances on Spike Timing Reliability of Cortical Neurons for Suprathreshold Rhythmic Inputs
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 194 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2003 by The MIT Press.