Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spratling, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spratling, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, M. H.
(Neural Computation. 2002;14:2157-2179.)
© 2002 The MIT Press


Letter

Preintegration Lateral Inhibition Enhances Unsupervised Learning

M. W. Spratling

m.spratling{at}bbk.ac.uk, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7JL, U.K.

M. H. Johnson

mark.johnson{at}bbk.ac.uk, Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, London WC1E 7JL, U.K.

A large and influential class of neural network architectures uses postintegration lateral inhibition as a mechanism for competition. We argue that these algorithms are computationally deficient in that they fail to generate, or learn, appropriate perceptual representations under certain circumstances. An alternative neural network architecture is presented here in which nodes compete for the right to receive inputs rather than for the right to generate outputs. This form of competition, implemented through preintegration lateral inhibition, does provide appropriate coding properties and can be used to learn such representations efficiently. Furthermore, this architecture is consistent with both neuroanatomical and neurophysiological data. We thus argue that preintegration lateral inhibition has computational advantages over conventional neural network architectures while remaining equally biologically plausible.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
K. Morita
Possible Role of Dendritic Compartmentalization in the Spatial Working Memory Circuit
J. Neurosci., July 23, 2008; 28(30): 7699 - 7724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
K. Morita, M. Okada, and K. Aihara
Selectivity and Stability via Dendritic Nonlinearity.
Neural Comput., July 1, 2007; 19(7): 1798 - 1853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
R. Kompass
A generalized divergence measure for nonnegative matrix factorization.
Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 780 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S. Fiori
Nonlinear Complex-Valued Extensions of Hebbian Learning: An Essay
Neural Comput., April 1, 2005; 17(4): 779 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
D. Domijan
Recurrent Network with Large Representational Capacity
Neural Comput., September 1, 2004; 16(9): 1917 - 1942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
J. Lucke and C. von der Malsburg
Rapid Processing and Unsupervised Learning in a Model of the Cortical Macrocolumn
Neural Comput., March 1, 2004; 16(3): 501 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cogn. Neurosci.Home page
M. W. Spratling and M. H. Johnson
A Feedback Model of Visual Attention
J. Cogn. Neurosci., February 1, 2004; 16(2): 219 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2002 by The MIT Press.