|
|
||||||||
Note |
Department of Statistics and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
Department of Statistics and Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, U.S.A.
Poisson processes usually provide adequate descriptions of the irregularity in neuron spike times after pooling the data across large numbers of trials, as is done in constructing the peristimulus time histogram. When probabilities are needed to describe the behavior of neurons within individual trials, however, Poisson process models are often inadequate. In principle, an explicit formula gives the probability density of a single spike train in great generality, but without additional assumptions, the firing-rate intensity function appearing in that formula cannot be estimated. We propose a simple solution to this problem, which is to assume that the time at which a neuron fires is determined probabilistically by, and only by, two quantities: the experimental clock time and the elapsed time since the previous spike. We show that this model can be fitted with standard methods and software and that it may used successfully to fit neuronal data.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Koyama and R. E. Kass Spike Train Probability Models for Stimulus-Driven Leaky Integrate-and-Fire Neurons Neural Comput., July 1, 2008; 20(7): 1776 - 1795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Czanner, U. T. Eden, S. Wirth, M. Yanike, W. A. Suzuki, and E. N. Brown Analysis of Between-Trial and Within-Trial Neural Spiking Dynamics J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2672 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Miura, Y. Tsubo, M. Okada, and T. Fukai Balanced Excitatory and Inhibitory Inputs to Cortical Neurons Decouple Firing Irregularity from Rate Modulations J. Neurosci., December 12, 2007; 27(50): 13802 - 13812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura Spike Train Decoding Without Spike Sorting Neural Comput., April 1, 2007; 20(4): 923 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Truccolo and J. P. Donoghue Nonparametric Modeling of Neural Point Processes via Stochastic Gradient Boosting Regression. Neural Comput., March 1, 2007; 19(3): 672 - 705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Nakahara, S.-i. Amari, and B. J. Richmond A comparison of descriptive models of a single spike train by information-geometric measure. Neural Comput., March 1, 2006; 18(3): 545 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Amarasingham, T.-L. Chen, S. Geman, M. T. Harrison, and D. L. Sheinberg Spike Count Reliability and the Poisson Hypothesis J. Neurosci., January 18, 2006; 26(3): 801 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura, C. Cai, and R. E. Kass Trial-to-Trial Variability and Its Effect on Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2928 - 2939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura, C. Cai, and R. E. Kass Statistical Assessment of Time-Varying Dependency Between Two Neurons J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2940 - 2947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Kass, V. Ventura, and E. N. Brown Statistical Issues in the Analysis of Neuronal Data J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2005; 94(1): 8 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Truccolo, U. T. Eden, M. R. Fellows, J. P. Donoghue, and E. N. Brown A Point Process Framework for Relating Neural Spiking Activity to Spiking History, Neural Ensemble, and Extrinsic Covariate Effects J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2005; 93(2): 1074 - 1089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Ventura Testing for and Estimating Latency Effects for Poisson and Non-Poisson Spike Trains Neural Comput., November 1, 2004; 16(11): 2323 - 2349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Wiener An Adjustment to the Time-Rescaling Method for Application to Short-Trial Spike Train Data Neural Comput., November 1, 2003; 15(11): 2565 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Wiener and B. J. Richmond Decoding Spike Trains Instant by Instant Using Order Statistics and the Mixture-of-Poissons Model J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2394 - 2406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Frank, U. T. Eden, V. Solo, M. A. Wilson, and E. N. Brown Contrasting Patterns of Receptive Field Plasticity in the Hippocampus and the Entorhinal Cortex: An Adaptive Filtering Approach J. Neurosci., May 1, 2002; 22(9): 3817 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. N. Brown, R. Barbieri, V. Ventura, R. E. Kass, and L. M. Frank The Time-Rescaling Theorem and Its Application to Neural Spike Train Data Analysis Neural Comput., February 1, 2002; 14(2): 325 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |