Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zibulevsky, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pearlmutter, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zibulevsky, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pearlmutter, B. A.
(Neural Computation. 2001;13:863-882.)
© 2001 The MIT Press


Letter

Blind Source Separation by Sparse Decomposition in a Signal Dictionary

Michael Zibulevsky

Department of Computer Science, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.

Barak A. Pearlmutter

Department of Computer Science and Department of Neurosciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, U.S.A.

The blind source separation problem is to extract the underlying source signals from a set of linear mixtures, where the mixing matrix is unknown. This situation is common in acoustics, radio, medical signal and image processing, hyperspectral imaging, and other areas. We suggest a two-stage separation process: a priori selection of a possibly overcomplete signal dictionary (for instance, a wavelet frame or a learned dictionary) in which the sources are assumed to be sparsely representable, followed by unmixing the sources by exploiting the their sparse representability. We consider the general case of more sources than mixtures, but also derive a more efficient algorithm in the case of a nonovercomplete dictionary and an equal numbers of sources and mixtures. Experiments with artificial signals and musical sounds demonstrate significantly better separation than other known techniques.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. Asari, B. A. Pearlmutter, and A. M. Zador
Sparse representations for the cocktail party problem.
J. Neurosci., July 12, 2006; 26(28): 7477 - 7490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
S.-i. Maeda, W.-J. Song, and S. Ishii
Nonlinear and Noisy Extension of Independent Component Analysis: Theory and Its Application to a Pitch Sensation Model
Neural Comput., January 1, 2005; 17(1): 115 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
Y. Li, A. Cichocki, and S.-i. Amari
Analysis of Sparse Representation and Blind Source Separation
Neural Comput., June 1, 2004; 16(6): 1193 - 1234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
K. Kreutz-Delgado, J. F. Murray, B. D. Rao, K. Engan, T.-W. Lee, and T. J. Sejnowski
Dictionary Learning Algorithms for Sparse Representation
Neural Comput., February 1, 2003; 15(2): 349 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neural Comput.Home page
A. C. Tang, B. A. Pearlmutter, N. A. Malaszenko, D. B. Phung, and B. C. Reeb
Independent Components of Magnetoencephalography: Localization
Neural Comput., August 1, 2002; 14(8): 1827 - 1858.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 2001 by The MIT Press.