|
|
||||||||
Letter |
Beckman Institute and Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A.
The deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC) integrate multisensory inputs and initiate an orienting response toward the source of stimulation (target). Multisensory enhancement, which occurs in the deep SC, is the augmentation of a neural response to sensory input of one modality by input of another modality. Multisensory enhancement appears to underlie the behavioral observation that an animal is more likely to orient toward weak stimuli if a stimulus of one modality is paired with a stimulus of another modality. Yet not all deep SC neurons are multisensory. Those that are exhibit the property of inverse effectiveness: combinations of weaker unimodal responses produce larger amounts of enhancement. We show that these neurophysiological findings support the hypothesis that deep SC neurons use their sensory inputs to compute the probability that a target is present. We model multimodal sensory inputs to the deep SC as random variables and cast the computation function in terms of Bayes' rule. Our analysis suggests that multisensory deep SC neurons are those that combine unimodal inputs that would be more uncertain by themselves. It also suggests that inverse effectiveness results because the increase in target probability due to the integration of multisensory inputs is larger when the unimodal responses are weaker.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. N. Carriere, D. W. Royal, and M. T. Wallace Spatial Heterogeneity of Cortical Receptive Fields and Its Impact on Multisensory Interactions J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2357 - 2368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Alvarado, T. R. Stanford, J. W. Vaughan, and B. E. Stein Cortex Mediates Multisensory But Not Unisensory Integration in Superior Colliculus J. Neurosci., November 21, 2007; 27(47): 12775 - 12786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. Rowland, S. Quessy, T. R. Stanford, and B. E. Stein Multisensory Integration Shortens Physiological Response Latencies J. Neurosci., May 30, 2007; 27(22): 5879 - 5884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Colonius and A. Diederich Multisensory Interaction in Saccadic Reaction Time: A Time-Window-of-Integration Model J. Cogn. Neurosci., July 1, 2004; 16(6): 1000 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P. N. Rao Bayesian Computation in Recurrent Neural Circuits Neural Comput., January 1, 2004; 16(1): 1 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Jiang and B. E. Stein Cortex Controls Multisensory Depression in Superior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2003; 90(4): 2123 - 2135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Zangenehpour and A. Chaudhuri Neural Activity Profiles of the Neocortex and Superior Colliculus after Bimodal Sensory Stimulation Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2001; 11(10): 924 - 935. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE | NEURAL COMPUTATION | MIT PRESS JOURNALS |