HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steinmetz, P. N. Articles by Winslow, R. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steinmetz, P. N. Articles by Winslow, R. L.

Optimal Detection of Flash Intensity Differences Using Rod Photocurrent Observations

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, U.S.A.

Raimond L. Winslow

Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, U.S.A.

The rod photocurrent contains two noise components that may limit the detectability of flash intensity increments. The limits imposed by the low- and high-frequency noise components were assessed by computing the performance of an optimal detector of increments in flash intensity. The limits imposed by these noise components depend on the interval of observation of the photocurrent signal. When the entire photocurrent signal, lasting 3 or more seconds, is observed, the low-frequency component of the photocurrent noise (attributed to the quantal noise of the incoming light, as well as random isomerizations of enzymes within the phototransduction cascade) is the most significant limitation on detectability. When only the first 380 ms or less is observed, the high-frequency component of the noise (due to the thermal isomerizations of the cGMP-gated channel) presents a significant limit on the detectability of flashes.