Neural Computation, Vol 11, 85-90, Copyright © 1999 by The MIT Press

NOTES

Narrow vs Wide Tuning Curves: What's Best for a Population Code?

Alexandre Pouget, Sophie Deneve, Jean-Christophe Ducom and Peter Latham

Neurophysiologists are often faced with the problem of evaluating the quality of a code for a sensory or motor variable, either to relate it to the performance of the animal in a simple discrimination task or to compare the codes at various stages along the neuronal pathway. One common belief that has emerged from such studies is that sharpening of tuning curves improves the quality of the code, although only to a certain point; sharpening beyond that is believed to be harmful. We show that this belief relies on either problematic technical analysis or improper assumptions about the noise. We conclude that one cannot tell, in the general case, whether narrow tuning curves are better than wide ones; the answer depends critically on the covariance of the noise. The same conclusion applies to other manipulations of the tuning curve profiles such as gain increase.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Natarajan, Q. J. M. Huys, P. Dayan, and R. S. Zemel Encoding and Decoding Spikes for Dynamic Stimuli Neural Comput., September 1, 2008; 20(9): 2325 - 2360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Foffani, J. K. Chapin, and K. A. Moxon Computational Role of Large Receptive Fields in the Primary Somatosensory Cortex J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2008; 100(1): 268 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Brown and A. Backer Optimal Neuronal Tuning for Finite Stimulus Spaces Neural Comput., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1511 - 1526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Montemurro and S. Panzeri Optimal Tuning Widths in Population Coding of Periodic Variables Neural Comput., July 1, 2006; 18(7): 1555 - 1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wu and S.-i. Amari Computing with Continuous Attractors: Stability and Online Aspects Neural Comput., October 1, 2005; 17(10): 2215 - 2239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zhang, K. T. Nakamoto, and L. M. Kitzes Modulation of Level Response Areas and Stimulus Selectivity of Neurons in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2005; 94(4): 2263 - 2274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Karmeier, H. G. Krapp, and M. Egelhaaf Population Coding of Self-Motion: Applying Bayesian Analysis to a Population of Visual Interneurons in the Fly J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 2182 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. R. D'Angelo, S. J. Sterbing, E.-M. Ostapoff, and S. Kuwada Role of GABAergic Inhibition in the Coding of Interaural Time Differences of Low-Frequency Sounds in the Inferior Colliculus J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2005; 93(6): 3390 - 3400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. I. Moore Frequency-Dependent Processing in the Vibrissa Sensory System J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2004; 91(6): 2390 - 2399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Yang and J. H. R. Maunsell The Effect of Perceptual Learning on Neuronal Responses in Monkey Visual Area V4 J. Neurosci., February 18, 2004; 24(7): 1617 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sahani and P. Dayan Doubly Distributional Population Codes: Simultaneous Representation of Uncertainty and Multiplicity Neural Comput., October 1, 2003; 15(10): 2255 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Todorov Cosine Tuning Minimizes Motor Errors Neural Comput., June 1, 2002; 14(6): 1233 - 1260. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				S. D. Wilke and C. W. Eurich Representational Accuracy of Stochastic Neural Populations Neural Comput., January 1, 2002; 14(1): 155 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Nakahara, S. Wu, and S.-i. Amari Attention Modulation of Neural Tuning Through Peak and Base Rate Neural Comput., September 1, 2001; 13(9): 2031 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Wu, H. Nakahara, and S.-i. Amari Population Coding with Correlation and an Unfaithful Model Neural Comput., April 1, 2001; 13(4): 775 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text]