Neural Comp. Sign up for ETOCS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodhill, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baier, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodhill, G.
Right arrow Articles by Baier, H.

Neural Computation, Vol 10, 521-527, Copyright © 1998 by The MIT Press


NOTES

Axon Guidance: Stretching Gradients to the Limit

Geoffrey Goodhill and Herwig Baier

Neuronal growth cones, the sensory-motile structures at the tips of developing axons, navigate to their targets over distances that can be many times greater than their diameter. They may accomplish this impressive task by following spatial gradients of axon guidance molecules in their environment (Bonhoeffer & Gierer, 1984; Tessier-Lavigne & Placzek, 1991; Baier & Bonhoeffer, 1994). We calculate the optimal shape of a gradient and the distance over which it can be detected by a growth cone for two competing mechanistic models of axon guidance. The results are surprisingly simple: Regardless of the mechanism, the maximum distance is about 1 cm. Since gradients and growth cones have coevolved, we suggest that the shape of the gradient in situ will predict the mechanism of gradient detection. In addition, we show that the experimentally determined dissociation constants for receptor-ligand complexes implicated in axon guidance are about optimal with respect to maximizing guidance distance. The relevance of these results to the retinotectal system is discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Xu, W. J. Rosoff, J. S. Urbach, and G. J. Goodhill
Adaptation is not required to explain the long-term response of axons to molecular gradients
Development, October 15, 2005; 132(20): 4545 - 4552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Weinl, U. Drescher, S. Lang, F. Bonhoeffer, and J. Loschinger
On the turning of Xenopus retinal axons induced by ephrin-A5
Development, April 15, 2003; 130(8): 1635 - 1643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. M. Isbister, P. J. Mackenzie, K. C. W. To, and T. P. O'Connor
Gradient Steepness Influences the Pathfinding Decisions of Neuronal Growth Cones In Vivo
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 193 - 202.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
J COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE NEURAL COMPUTATION MIT PRESS JOURNALS
Copyright © 1998 by The MIT Press.